Dry Run was a False Alarm, JihadWatch won’t backtrack on calling it terrorism

Two men were arrested after their plane landed in Holland, the speculation was that they were doing a dry run for a terrorist organization. However no proof was advanced and just today the two men were let go.

When this story broke out JihadWatch’s Marisol treated it as though it was a proven case of terrorism.

First she asked the question,

“Just your garden-variety Dutchmen gone wrong? Wooden-shoe bombers?”

and then she answers it simply,

“No.”

Will we hear an apology or at least an acceptance of the fact that JihadWatch was being purposefully deceptive? No. This is par for the course on JihadWatch, when anything remotely relating to Islam and Muslims comes up in the news and implicates Muslims in violence they push it as Jihad or terrorism related. When they are proven wrong they either ignore it or sheepishly shrug it off.

Two Men Arrested on United Flight on Terror Concerns Freed Without Charges

Dutch prosecutors have let go two Yemeni men who were initially detained over concerns of a possible terror “dry run,” they said Wednesday.

Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi and Hezam al Murisi were arrested during a United Flight from Chicago to Amsterdam Monday. They were released without charges.

American law enforcement officials say their initial concerns about a possible terror “dry run” involving the two eased, in part because they have learned the men’s abrupt change in flights resulted from them missing their original flight.

“These two passengers have not been charged with any crime in the United States and we caution you against jumping to any conclusions,” said a statement issued by the Department of Homeland Security Tuesday afternoon.

Al Soofi began his trip in Birmingham, Alabama and al Murisi started from Memphis, Tennessee.

27 thoughts on “Dry Run was a False Alarm, JihadWatch won’t backtrack on calling it terrorism

  1. Spencer’s methodology which I assume he teaches to subordinates such as Marisol is not to apologize for anything. Don’t even waste time expecting it.

  2. A comment or an article probably just set one of the loons off. They’re very prone to aggression it seems; a characteristic of the feeble-minded.

    I’d suggest having multiple mirror-sites, and/or posting the articles on various forums. Having everything only on one site, isn’t a good idea when those who oppose it are feeble-minded haters with hacking skills.

  3. Not only did the story you linked to not say the incident was a false alarm, but you left this bit out when you quoted the story:

    “Officials Say Questions Linger About ‘Strange’ Luggage but New Information Shows No Security Threat ”

    We’ll see if Danios is a man of his word and apologizes over his fabricated story of the Israeli rabbi calling for the ‘genocide’ of Palestinians.

    • Are you lying again? Where is the proof that it is fabricated?
      If you don’t trust a Muslim will you trust the BBC?

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11127409

      Here are one of your Rabbi’s good deeds (good deed according to you)…
      “In 2001, during a Palestinian uprising, he called for the annihilation of Arabs and said it was forbidden to be merciful to them.”

      Genocidal enough for ya? Or does your definition of genocidal make an exception for Muslims?

  4. If you look at the article, only the first half is quoted. It is my understanding that Mooneye thought the article ended there (I did too). You’re making it seem as if only 1 sentence was deliberately left out. In any case, your sentence means nothing, because it’s been found that there was nothing wrong with the ‘strange’ luggage. You do know how to read right? So, I’ll allow you to explain…care to decipher the apparently hidden meaning behind this sentence:

    Officials Say Questions Linger About ‘Strange’ Luggage but New Information Shows No Security Threat

    And what does the Israeli rabbi have to do with this article? Can’t organize your thoughts huh?

    Seriously, what’s your aim? Your arguments are as shitty as a public toilet.

    • The point is that Spencer is a goon who makes a living off of fomenting interfaith strife and hostility. When this controversy is over, no one will remember him, just as no one remembers David Duke. (who’s that guy?)

      • David Duke attends conferences in Syria.

        But really, I’ll (patiently) wait to see if Danios backtracks for calling the Rabbi’s comments ‘genocidal’ against all Palestinians.

        A two minute google search blows your days old stories out of the water.

        • David Duke attends conferences in the United States

          “In 2001, during a Palestinian uprising, he (Rabbi you love) called for the annihilation of Arabs and said it was forbidden to be merciful to them.”

          Yeah, great Rabbi JihadBob! Genocidal enough for you?
          I think we should all ask JihadBob to take back his comments.

        • Why do keep on defending that particular Rabbi–he has a long history of bigotry? The Rabbis the website you linked to *condemned* are much more noble mohttp://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2010/09/rabbis-so-open-minded-their-brains-fall.htmlre noble.

          JihadBob fails again

    • Wow. Your stubborness is amazing. Guess your definition of genocide makes an exception for Muslim

      “In 2001, during a Palestinian uprising, he (Rabbi you love) called for the annihilation of Arabs and said it was forbidden to be merciful to them.”

      You really wanna defend this dude?
      Go bitch to Yahoo and the BBC, they weren’t to kind to your ideological kin either.

  5. JihadBob (aka Robert Spencer),

    Why are you so desperate to defend that genocidal Rabbi who also believed that Holocaust victims deserved their fates.

    Why the hell should Danios apologise when the Rabbi actually made those comments and he was just quoting a reputable Israeli news site (Haaretz). Though you might know them better as those damn-leftists-dhimmi-self hating jews- that-secretly-love-Mooslems.

  6. I posted this in the other article to in response to Jihad Bob.
    Ok…Wishing death upon Abu Mazen isn’t crazy…silly me. O and when he says Palestinians who persecute Israel, he means all Palestinians since he says all Palestinians are “evil, bitter enemies of Israel.” Wait a sec, didn’t he say all those evil people should perish…“Abu Mazen and all these evil people should perish from this world,”
    Shit…He did. Sounds like inciting genocide to my ears but hell, you’re creative Jihad Bob. I’m sure you’ll find a way to interpret this as him saying he loves Palestinians.

    My source…
    http://www.jstandard.com/content/item/rabbis_statement_take

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *