Stoke-on-Trent: Pipe Bomb Left at Mosque

Islamophobia? What Islamophobia? These four youth were probably a bunch of undercover Mooslims practicing taqiyyah to take over the West.

Of course over at JihadWatch, Spencer and his drones probably blame the Muslim victims at the mosque for “provoking” the teenagers by being Muslim and worshipping in a mosque.

(hat tip: Marco)

Four arrests over Stoke-on-Trent mosque arson

(BBC)

Four teenagers have been arrested after a gas pipe was put into a Stoke-on-Trent mosque in an attempt to set light to the building, police said.

The incident is being treated by police as a deliberate racist attack.

Officers were called to Regent Road at 0630 GMT after live CCTV footage showed smoke emerging from inside the building.

Three males aged 16, 18 and 19, and an 18-year-old female remain in custody. All are from the local area.

A Staffordshire Police spokeswoman said there was no structural damage, but the fire was being treated as a case of criminal damage.

‘Community appalled’

Police said the attackers fed a gas pipe from a nearby building through a mosque window.

Ch Insp Wayne Jones said: “It’s clearly visible for people to see.

“A gas meter on an external wall has been interfered with. That’s gone into the mosque and the damage could have been significant.

“At this stage we are treating this incident as a racist attack on a religious building.

“I am sure the community are as appalled as we are at this behaviour.”

Stoke-on-Trent CID are examining the scene and CCTV footage of the area.

19 thoughts on “Stoke-on-Trent: Pipe Bomb Left at Mosque

  1. The incident is being treated by police as a deliberate racist attack.

    What race is Islam, again?

    Well, you didn’t expect all of the Brits to hand over their country and culture to the flood of Muslim immigrants without a fight, did you? Of course what they did was wrong, but after 7/7 and the waves of radical Muslims who have invaded the country, this is hardly surprising.

    • Did you just try to explain their actions? You say what they did was wrong but do you think it was wrong.

      “but after 7/7 and the waves of radical Muslims who have invaded the country, this is hardly surprising.”

      Okay. Usually, Americans get all emotional when we try to explain to them why 9/11 happened. Not because some cave-dwelling Mooslim suddenly developed a hatred of your freedoms. Not because pesky Mooslims were inspired by the Quran to take down the nearest skyscrapers. But considering the creation of Israel, the Six Day War, the Yom Kippur War, the oppression of the Palestinians even during peacetime, the Americans support of Israel, Americans pressuring Iraq and Iran to fight, the cruel sanctions on Iraq, the invasion of Iraq, the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq (again! Seriously what’s wrong with you?), the drone attacks in Pakistan and much much more in between, it’s ‘hardly surprising’ that Osama bin Laden attacked America on 9/11. See, now this is going to be controversial, perhaps make front page news on JihadWatch, maybe Fox News will start crying about this at some point.

      But if its okay for the English to terrorise the Muslims they themselves let into their country with open arms, then I’m sure its okay for Arabs to terrorise Americans if they treat them even worse. (/sarcasm)

      By the way, I do not support the attacks on 9/11. I’m just making a point that no matter how hard things get, whether America is massacring children in Iraq or Abdullah opened a Halal food store in England, you can’t respond by killing civilians.

    • So, it’s “understandable” when ignorant non-Muslims attempt to commit acts of terrorism against Muslims over perceived victimization, but when ignorant Muslims attempt to commit acts of terrorism against non-Muslims over perceived victimization, then it isn’t “understandable”?

      Why exactly should the two be seen or treated any differently, when the means, motives and goals are the same?

  2. Muslims tried to blow up a church in Indonesia today. I guess that wasn’t important enough to post. Gotta project that image of Muslims being the victims am i rite? You poor, poor oppressed minorities.

    Link

    • What about the mega-cathedral freshly built in Indonesia in 2008. The new Churches being built around the Muslim World. Sure, there are Muslim extremists knocking down churches once in a while but they’re ignorant and idiotic. They are scapegoating the Christian community for their problems. A bit like how nearly every society found someone to blame whenever there was a bad time. These days, its Mooslims: What did we ever do to your banking system? Nothing really, but because we’re weird and exotic, we have to suffer.

      Oh and here’s another Church having a hard time. Those pesky “taqiyya-sprayin” Mooslims! No wait…It was none other than the peaceful people of America thinking it was a Mosque.

      http://spencerwatch.com/2010/11/17/spencer-complains-about-story-linking-him-to-ground-zero-mosque/

      See how I can spin that? That’s what you do. A few people burn a Church in Indonesia and suddenly all Muslims are to blame. What about the Muslims that stood side by side with Christians in Iraq to protest Al-Qaeda’s attack on a Church? And which rock were you hiding under during the Babri Mosque demolition?

    • http://www.indonesiamatters.com/7032/suryadharma-ali-religion/

      “According to Ali from 1977 to 2004 the growth in Islamic places of worship was the lowest of all, with the complete figures being:

      Hindu temples: + 475%
      Buddhist temples: + 368%
      Catholic churches: + 152%
      Protestant churches: + 131%
      Mosques: + 64%
      The raw numbers as of 2004 stood at:

      640,000 mosques
      44,000 Protestant churches
      24,000 Hindu temples
      12,400 Catholic churches
      7,100 Buddhist temples”

      The growth rate for Hindu temples is the highest despite Indonesia’s law about building other houses of worship. Look how many Hindu temples and Churches are being built in Indonesia, and Americans find it difficult for another Mosque to be built in New York.

    • Muslims tried to blow up a church in Indonesia today. I guess that wasn’t important enough to post.

      Loonwatch has a clearly defined mission, and that is to “to monitor and expose the web’s plethora of anti-Muslim loons, wackos, and conspiracy theorists.” JihadBob already asked Loonwatch to cover the bombing against Christians in Iraq, and Loonwatch did. When Robert Spencer stops spreading hatred and begins treating Islam and Muslims in an honest and fair manner, then you can complain. Otherwise, crawl to next story about Muslims being attacked and make an excuse for the criminals, just like you did here.

      • And Jihadwatch has a clearly defined mission… to bring news about global jihad. Why does this site act like Jihadwatch should be reporting on things like the homemade bomb factory in California? It’s clearly unrelated to the global Islamic jihad, so it’s not reported.

        I don’t expect this site to report on and condemn Islamic terrorists. I only expect this site to make excuses for them. So far, I’ve been right.

      • JihadWatch is watching Jihad. That’s fine it can watch birds, cars, trains, Jihad…whatever it wants to watch. But it gives the impression that only Muslims commit terrorism and Spencer speaks as if terrorism was invented by Muslims.

        When a point is made about Spencer not covering a story, no one actually expects Spencer to do so because that wouldn’t make sense, but we’re saying that Spencer can no longer make it seem like Muslims are the only ones causing terrorism in the world.

        • “…we’re saying that Spencer can no longer make it seem like Muslims are the only ones causing terrorism in the world.”

          Has Spencer ever said that muslims are the only ones causing terrorism in the world? References, please…

          • “…Spencer can no longer make it seem like Muslims…”

            By selectively highlighting incidences of Muslim terrorism on his hate site, whilst conveniently ignoring cases of Hindu, Jewish or Christian terrorism, he certainly does make it seem as if only Muslims are doing terrorism. If someone was to spend a lot of his time on JihadWatch, that’s all he /she would hear about.

            If you learnt to read properly you might have noticed how I mentioned that Spencer “made it seem like Muslims are the only ones causing terrorism”. I never said that was what he said. But he made it seem like that was the case.

            Now you look like an idiot.

          • he certainly does make it seem as if only Muslims are doing terrorism.

            So, in other words, he never said that only Muslims are committing terrorism. Got it. Make sure you put the straw man away when you’re done playing with it.

          • If you learn to read Ahni, you might understand how I never said that was what Spencer said. I said that by selectively showing cases of Muslim terrorism on his site, that is the impression he gives.

  3. Well, you didn’t expect all of the Brits to hand over their country and culture to the flood of Muslim immigrants without a fight, did you?

    Wow just wow. So to combat an imaginary handover of Britain and it’s culture to a flood of Muslim immigrants (<—-LMFAO), Britons should attack Mosques full of innocent Muslims? Gotcha.

    • British culture is indeed dying and that death is the result of islam. In order to save British culture, and it’s worth saving in my opinion, the solution isn’t to attack mosques full of muslims but to deport all muslims that refuse to integrate and assimilate into British culture.

      It’s very simple – cultures are not equivalent. “Multiculturalism” is a fabrication. You can’t screw a 9 year old girl in British culture, but that’s okay in an islamic culture. You can’t behead someone who thinks differently than you in British culture, but you can in islamic culture. You can’t cut the hands and feet off of someone who steels food to feed their family in British culture, but you can in islamic culture.

      The handover of Britain and it’s culture to islam isn’t imaginary – wait 60 years and see – muslims outbreed the rest of us 3 to 1 and that means Britain will be a muslim majority country by then and sharia law will be mandatory. If you’re a Christian or a Jew you’ll be a dhimmi paying taxes to survive… if you’re an infidel you’ll be lucky to stay alive at all. As muslims say, you might beat us on the battlefield but we’ll beat you in the bedroom.

      • You are wrong.

        If British culture dies, it would only be because of its own shortcomings. Cultures only die because more viable ones take their place. That’s evolution and natural selection. You must not think very much of British culture, with such a poor perspective of it.

        As for Islamic culture, you think you can just read a few things about Islam, and think that’s all there is to it? You’re wrong. Unless you’ve actually experienced it for yourself, all you have to say about it, is nothing but ignorance.

      • If you think British culture is so weak that it can be destroyed by a few taxi-drivin’ Mooslims, then you evidently don’t have faith in British culture. If there is a future takeover of Britain by Muslims it will only be because of people like who aren’t confident about British culture.

    • Ahni, the fact that you sympathise with the people who committed these attacks and believe any future attacks against Muslims justifiable because they accepted the British government’s offer to live in the UK “leads me to believe you are probably somebody the FBI should have their eye on”.

      If I had said something like, “you didn’t expect the Muslims to hand over their country and culture to a flood of American soldiers”, you would accuse me of being a terrorist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *